Status Meeting 8/11/2006

StephenPitts? , HongqiangLi? , ZhaohuiSun? , and BillBug? were there.

We went over the status of each system component. Action items are in ActionItems

GnHardware

We talked about the current configuration of the cluster and how it has changed since the past meeting.

1. Reconfigured cluster:

  • HeadmasterMachine -- Roundup server, LVS switching
  • WebqtlMachine -- new web server, wiki
  • Web2qtlMachine? -- new database server
  • Opteron -- no change
  • Cluster -- current gn.org

The ideal configuration will involve three web servers:

server codebase purpose
live latest Subversion release public web site
testing latest Subversion release test data changes against latest codebase
beta latest Subversion trunk test changes made by individual developers

HongqiangLi? is in the process of converting WebtwoQtlMachine? in to a backup web and database server.

2. Cluster crashing problems We discussed the recent cluster crashing problems and BillBug? suggested some ActionItems to fix them.

3. Progress building new images of the cluster machines: web server, node, database

GnCodebase

We discussed the new shared code directory in /gnshare on WebqtlMachine. Eventually, our goal is for it to replace Jintao's original code directory. As we copy the data from the current working code directory (/node_apps/www/htmml/webqtl/beta), we are documenting the new /gnshare that we build.

The initial Subversion repository layout is described in GnCodebaseMigration.

We eventually plan to move to a system that has three main directories (standard procedure for Subversion)

trunk code that passes integration testing
branches where developers work on code
releases roll out to live site after extensive testing

Zhaohui suggests that we have a tags directory (instead of releases directory) that will hold our real releases, trunk as a development directory, and branches directory will hold branches for different features or testing. This follows a standard practice many people are doing.

BillBug? suggested that we use ant to automate testing and automate merging, and offered to come down to help out with ant setup when he comes to Memphis. He also reemphasized the necessity of some data modelling tools and offered to create an example setup using open source software of a semi-automated roundtrip setup from SQL DDL to UML diagrams.

In addition, roundtrip tools from the Python code to UML diagrams would be very useful.

The smpitts branch changes are merged in to the main repository, but the dark corners have not been tested, so we need to keep working on the requirements document and ensure that all features work.

GnDatabase

We discussed how to best setup two database servers. We want a live database and a beta database to test data changes. The devil is in the details, though. We can easily load the beta database with a current copy of the live database and play with it, but it is unclear how to synchronize the databases. One option is to see whether mysql server can access tables on another server and configure the beta database only with new tables, linking it to the existing data. In any case, synchronization will be a manual process, but there are probably tools that can help us.

We have not resolved the question of whether MyISAM? or InnoDB? is best suited to our needs. BillBug? suggested that we will probably encounter a tradeoff between a system that is optimized for data updated and one that is optimized for static queries, so it might be beneificial to run one on the beta database and another on the main one.

Also, BillBug? suggested that, in general, we should be more systematic with the way that we roll new code and data out to the site.

Topic revision: r4 - 15 Aug 2006 - 17:13:57 - ZhaohuiSun
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback